SO LET'S GET STARTED WITH MY FIRST POST MOVE :
SINCE IT'S CONFUSING WHEN EXACTLY IS MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DAY,
IN THE SPIRIT OF "HATE WHITEY DAY" I WILL MAKE THIS POST TODAY
FOR MY "FRIENDS" IN THE U.S.A. ! SO THEY CAN CELEBR-HATE HOW FAR
THERE SLAVES HAVE COME ON THEIR MARCH TO THE MOUNTAIN TOP
AND TO THE WHITE HOUSE IN WASHINGTON D.C. !
RON PAUL (AKA MAGNETO LOL!) QUOTES FROM HIS BOOK LIBERTY DEFINED:
PARTS ON THE CHAPTER ON DISCRIMINATION (*WHICH IS MORE ABOUT HIS VIEWS ON THE FAILURE OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND WHY HE IS OPPOSED TO THE IDEA OF "REPARATIONS")
"Choosing friends of good character is discrimination that we should all endorse. We all discriminate on whom we invite into our homes and whom we date and marry, go to church and generally socialize with. It’s a right we all cherish and we should understand exactly what it is. This is positive discrimination and should never be regulated by government."
"But it is a different matter when it comes to politics. Here is where the word “discrimination” indicates some sin against the civic religion. To be sure, banning blatant discrimination in all government programs makes perfect sense. Government programs are constructed for public access.
But forcing people to integrate and avoid discrimination in all private transactions through affirmative action laws is a different matter. Forced integration in private affairs, instead of bringing people together, actually exacerbates the conflicts that many are trying to eliminate.
Governments have notoriously written laws that segregated people whether by race, gender, or sexual orientation. This practice was common from the time of slavery until the policy was replaced with affirmative action and forced association in private affairs, thus substituting one set of violations of individual rights with another. Evidence is slim that the hostility between the various groups has been diminished with all the legislation of the past fifty years."
"Voluntary associations are better, are more authentic, and are longer lasting, than associations forced by legislation and imposed by bureaucrats. Martin Luther King, Jr., advised that a person’s character should be the only measure of a person’s worth and the color of one’s skin should be irrelevant. Yet quotas and affirmative action programs are based on certain groups qualifying for special privileges. Reversing the discrimination hasn’t brought people together. Resentment remains in many areas but not where character and talent are the tests of one’s ability. This is true in sports, entertainment, finance, politics, and in the professions."
"Even more appalling is the presumption that wherever blacks and whites and others associate freely and to their mutual benefit, and whenever a person makes accommodation for disability—and this is far more common than one would think from the media—it is due solely to government laws that have forced the issue. The idea here is that if people are left to their own devices, they will always and everywhere choose homogeneity in their social associations. I can’t imagine a stranger view of the human condition. To me it demonstrates that the supporters of antidiscrimination have an extremely low view of people and their choices."
"Outlawing discrimination has made for a less free and less prosperous society without bringing the various groups closer together."
"Falsely and loudly accusing someone of racism or anti-Semitism if the person is not in agreement with reparations is the worst form of bigotry."
"If reparations are available, it’s hardly a surprise that the line of eager recipients grows quickly. Even those who don’t qualify under the rules get in line. Many times those demanding reparations were never personally injured. The result is that undeserving recipients demand financial benefits for something they did not suffer from people who had nothing to do with the injustice. It doesn’t sound very fair to me."
PARTS ON THE CHAPTER ON HATE CRIMES (*IN WHICH HE TRIES TO MAKE HIS POINT OF TRYING TO PROTECT INDIVIDUAL'S RIGHT TO AT LEAST HAVE THE RIGHT TO HAVE FREEDOM OF HATE SPEECH IF WE CAN'T EXPRESS OUR HATE AND DISCRIMINATION AGAINST OTHERS PHYSICALLY...TO PREVENT IN THE FUTURE THE EXISTENCE OF THE THOUGHT POLICE LIKE IN THE MOVIE "MINORITY REPORT")
"Passing legislation concerning crimes against minorities is supposed to show compassion and prove that our society does not discriminate. In fact, these laws do the opposite. Confidence that such efforts will help protect minorities causes a gross misunderstanding of individual rights. If all individuals should be treated the same under the law, providing greater penalties to those who commit crimes against certain racial or sexual orientation groups nullifies this effort. It means that the law provides lesser penalties to those individuals committing crimes against people without that favored orientation."
"The fallacy of this type of legislation has led to the routine understanding of groups having rights rather than all individuals having equal rights.
Too often, we hear reference to gay rights, minority rights, and women’s rights, etc., which undermines the concept of individual liberty.
The idea that a crime can be judged as to whether it was motivated by hate for certain groups introduces the notion of a thought police. If someone is robbed, beaten, or killed, the penalty should be unrelated to what the perpetrator was thinking at the time. It hardly matters. The actions are the actions.
Imposing preferential penalties endorses the concept of relative rights, which is of course a very dangerous, slippery slope. It implies that some victims have greater worth than others. The extra and arbitrary enforcement power mocks the principle of equal justice before the law. Why should the penalty for assault be different depending on race, sexual orientation, or membership in a particular group?
Because some criminals have in the past been punished less harshly due to their victims’ belonging to a particular group is hardly a justification for a criminal to be punished more harshly for the same reason. It’s best we drop the whole concept of hyphenated rights and refer only to individual rights."
"If we continue to arbitrarily punish someone more severely for committing a “hate” crime, we must make an assessment of the thoughts and speech of the perpetrator. It won’t take a giant leap for Congress to punish bigoted speech even without an act of violence. Political correctness has already gone too far, with great social penalties for people who inadvertently and without malice or in jest offend certain ethnic, racial, or sexual groups."
"When hate crime legislation is written or proposed it comes up short in promoting justice."
"When hate crime legislation is not driven by political concerns, it relates more to social order than anything else. The perceived goal is to address certain crimes and for emotional reasons exact greater penalties for certain individuals. Most people think of this in a one-sided manner. Included are crimes that involve white on black or other minorities, straight on gay, Christian on Muslim, Muslim on Jew, yet the reverse of these generally is not labeled a hate crime."
"Hate crime legislation and the obsession with political correctness seem to satisfy the urge to condemn thoughtless people by misusing the law. This misuse then accomplishes nothing in solving the problems, while it promotes a perverted view of equal justice—a result that was never intended."
PARTS ON THE CHAPTER ON RACISM (WHICH I THINK KIND OFF NEGATES HIS LOGIC ABOUT INDIVIDUALITY IN THE ABOVE CHAPTERS I QUOTED ABOUT DISCRIMINATION AND HATE CRIME ):
"The term “racism” is thrown around loosely these days. Sometimes it applies, and sometimes it does not. I define the term as
(1) the defining and disparaging of a whole people due primarily to its racial, ethnic, or religious makeup, which leads to
(2) the desire to deny an individual or group full rights in the civic community, and
(3) the related impulse to see some harm come to an individual or group through private or public means. The terms “racism” or “racist” could apply to one or all of the above."
"With this definition in mind, it should be clear that racism is a problem that begins with a denial of individualism. A racist believes that some group trait always trumps all individual traits. This is the first error, and it stems from a desire to simplify the reality of group heterogeneity (people really are different) for the sake of convenience or quick thinking."
"It is not racism, of course, to expect the fans of one team to cheer if their team makes a point. But if you believe that this shared interest of a group obliterates individual differences, or that individual differences do not matter at all by comparison to the group trait, we see the beginnings of a racist cast of mind."
"A white person who sees no good in any action or words of a black person provides the most obvious example of racism." (*REMEMBER "THE MARTIN LUTHER KING HATE WHITEY DAY" HOLIDAY NEWLETTER QUOTE OR CALLING NEW YORK "ZOO VILLE" OR CALLING ALL BLACK PEOPLE "ANIMALS")
"The problem of personal attitudes is, however, not the crucial issue. The problem is how these attitudes come to have a political expression. During the great wave of European immigration to the United States in the late nineteenth century, the anti-Italian and anti-Irish feelings on the part of the majority might have been understandable from historical context, but they led to real effects in the form of political disabilities being imposed on these groups. It was the same with the Jim Crow laws that followed Reconstruction in the South. Such laws not only violated human rights; they led to long-simmering resentments that had terrible human and political consequences."
"Government-backed racism is designed to shore up government power. The idea is to steer popular opinion that should be directed against one’s own government toward some evil foreign enemy. This is the essence of the propaganda that has accompanied every U.S. war effort—and probably every war effort by every government. Racism thrives on dehumanizing people, encouraging people to believe that the object of their hated is not deserving of human rights. It is even more despicable when governments do these things even as they claim to be protecting the rest of us against racism at home."
"I really don’t know what is worse: the false claims of racism or the harboring of prejudice; the actual sponsorship of racism by the government itself in wartime or the support of “affirmative action” and “quotas” in the name of ending racism. All these actions are contrary to the individualism that a free society should uphold without compromise."
PARTS ON THE CHAPTER ON RELIGION AND LIBERTY (*JUST WANTED TO ADD THIS ONE WHILE OBAMA WHO IS RELATED TO THE REPUBLICANS THROUGH BUSH & CHENEY IS BEATING THE IRAN WAR DRUM FOR THE CHRISTIAN-ZIONISTS) WHILE THINKING THEIR MISSION IN IRAQ IS ACCOMPLISHED:
"How many times have we heard neoconservatives repeat the mantra that religious fanatics attack us for our freedoms and prosperity? Neoconservatives deliberately use religion to stir up hatred toward the enemy."
PARTS ON THE CHAPTER ON SLAVERY:
"This is sometimes the fate of crucial issues such as slavery. Discussion of them is banned. Those who spoke out strongly against slavery were frowned upon and suffered for it socially and politically. But they persisted in any case."
"Still, the fundamental issue did not go away. You can silence debate but you can’t sweep fundamental moral issues such as slavery under the carpet. And what is slavery? It is the presumption that one human being can literally own and control another human being, such that the slave can be worked, bought, and sold without the free exercise of individual volition. Extrapolating that idea in the macro sense, isn’t that also the case with a whole society ruled by a vast leviathan state? We got rid of the individual form of slavery and replaced it with a growing problem of another kind of slavery. Think of the draft, confiscatory taxation, laws and mandates against home schooling, speech controls, or any number of impositions of life and property, and regulations designed to control our social and business associations. There is a sense in which these can all be considered forms of slavery."
"Wendell Phillips became known as the voice of the abolitionist movement while Garrison was known as the backbone. Phillips’s efforts consumed him for twenty-five years. He eventually achieved his victory, but tragically it was accomplished only with a ghastly and probably needless Civil War that took greater than six hundred thousand American lives. It was tragic that the abolishment of slavery was not achieved as it had been in all other Western nations, peacefully. More attention should have been paid to John Quincy Adams’s tenacity to do it with a change in the Constitution."
"Generally speaking, the abolitionists were supporters of secession. They wanted to separate themselves in the northeast from the slave owners of the South and let them deal with the issue." (*LIKE SLAVERY ENDED IN THE NORTH...LIKE THERE'S NO EVIDENCE OF SLAVES BURIED UNDER NEW YORK)
"In this effort, the question was never raised that the states didn’t have a right to secede. Many people who favored secession also believed, and rightly, that the modern industrial state would eventually work to eliminate slavery."
"Phillips paid a high price for his long effort to rid the country of the scourge of slavery. Throughout all of early America he was scorned and ridiculed. He never wavered in his convictions and saw himself as an agitator and reformer whose goal was to force the American people to face the issue of slavery as a moral imperative."
"Most importantly, Wendell Phillips knew the importance of the agitator. The agitator proselytizes; he does not write the laws. The purpose of the agitator is to change people’s opinion so that great and significant social change can be achieved. Elimination of slavery from this continent, after more than 200 years, was a goal he clearly understood and sought."
"Though great agitators for liberty in past centuries have struggled to keep the spirit alive, the climate looks quite healthy for significant and fruitful social and political changes to come out of hibernation. We all need to become agitators for liberty, else we end up in a permanent state of slavery."
THERE'S ALSO A CHAPTER ON ZIONISM THAT MIGHT OFFEND SOME WHO ARE BUSY CARRYING ASSASSINATIONS AND TRINA COME UP WITH A COALITION OF THE WILLING TO EMBARK ON A MUTUAL DESTRUCTION NUCLEAR CONFRONTATION... BUT NOT ME... I'M BANGIN' ON THE SAME DRUMS...BUT FOR A DIFFERENT REASON (TO NO DO WITH BEN STEIN WOULD DO ! LOL... IF U DON'T GET IT... YOUR NOT SUPPOSE TO !)
---------------------------
SO I WAS GONNA WAIT A LITTLE LONGER IN THE REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL
RACE TO MOVE TO PLAN C... BUT FUCK IT WHY WAIT ! THIS IS NOTHING NEW !
THIS IS OLD NEWS ! IT WON'T CHANGE THE MINDS OF SOME TOOLS !
AND EVEN SOME COONS ! THIS NEW "DAVID DUKE" MIGHT WIN JUST BECAUSE FOOLS WILL RUN TO THE OTHER PARTY BECAUSE OBAMA DIDN'T KNOW HOW TO PASS THE MOP OR THE BROOM ! OR DIDN'T CARE ABOUT ALL OF THEM THAT ARE POOR HOMELESS OR SINGING AND FEELING THE "ECONOMIC" BLUES !
SO I PRESENT MY NEXT SUPER PACK:
CAN RON PAUL TRULY DISAVOW HIS RACIST PAST
IN IT THERE'S ALL THE BOOKS "MAGNETO" (LOL) WROTE AND SOME OF HIS NEWSLETTERS HE CLAIMS HE DIDN'T WRITE OR READ AND SOME OTHER STUFF
WHICH LINKS HIM CLEARLY TO WHITE SUPREMACISTS (WELL TO ME AT LEAST BEYOND ANY SHADOW OF A DOUBT...WHY ? BECAUSE I'M NOT AFRAID TO CALL A SPADE A SPADE ! LOL...SORRY THIS "SPADER-MAN" JUST HAD TO WRITE THAT ! LOL )
I ALREADY POSTED SOME PARTS OF HIS BOOK WHICH IS INCLUDED IN THE SUPER-PACK... BUT THERE'S OTHER STUFF LIKE PICTURES AND AUDIO INTERVIEWS BY CERTAIN PEOPLE SUPPORTING HIM (THOSE SOMEONE LOOK FAMILIAR IN THE PICTURE BELOW...DOESN'T HE LOOK LIKE SOMEONE IN A VIDEO BELOW ? LOL):
AND HERE'S A PREVIEW OF A FEW VIDEOS I INCLUDED TOO (INCLUDING THE ADD BY JON HUNSTMAN WHO JUST TODAY BOWED OUT OF THE RACE...I'M SURE IT'S BECAUSE OF THIS VID AND HIS BREAKING RONALD REAGAN'S 11TH COMMANDMENT : "THOU SHALT NOT SPEAK ILL OF ANOTHER REPUBLICAN...NOT EXPOSE HIM AS A RACIST BIGOT TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC...BUT IT'S OK TO BE AN HYPOCRITE FLIP FLOPPER AND ATTACK OTHER CANDIDATES ABOUT THEIR MORALITY REGARDING FINANCE AND BUSINESS LIKE NEWT GINGRICH EVEN IF YOU ARE NOT BLAMELESS AND LIKE YOU WOULD WIN IN DEBATE AGAINST OBAMA OR DO BETTER ONCE YOU WOULD BECOME PRESIDENT IN SOLVING THE ECONOMIC CRISIS !" LOL... SORRY I ADDED THE FINEPRINT AND THE SECRET "CLAUSES" LOL ! ):
Racist Don Black Explains Why He Supports Ron Paul
Jon Huntsman Campaign Ad: Is Ron Paul Is A Unelectable Racist?
Ron Paul Wouldn't Have Voted For The 1964 Civil Rights Act
Ron Paul Racist Quotes
SO THAT'S ALL FOR NOW... I GOT STUFF TO DO LIKE RECORD SOME "AMATEURISH GIBBERISH JUST TO CAUSE STATIC TO SOME F@%^$TS" INCLUDING MY THEME
MUSIC FOR "HATE MAGNETO AND HIS MUTANTS DAY" ! I'LL GIVE Y'ALL SOMETHING TO CELEBRATE DURING BLACK HISTORY MONTH AND ST-VALENTINES DAY LOLLOLLOLOLOL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment